![]() ![]() You can load such a weapon as part of an attack with it or as a regular object interaction. If you have the Extra Attack feature, you can fire two such weapons on the same turn, provided both are loaded. You need a free hand to load a D&D weapon with the ammunition property. Regarding the original question, the Ammunition property would make wielding 2 hand crossbows ineffective even with Extra Attack correct? (Barring something special like repeating shot) This is my biggest complaint with Twitter is that some people may not notice this follow up. What's the confusion? Extra Attack imposes no limitations on what weapons you use with it. ![]() It contradicts the rules as currently written to allow it. I am honestly more confused now than I was before. The Extra Attack feature, for instance, leaves the door open for any two weapons to be used together, but then a particular weapon property says, "Wait just a minute!" You don't need to worry about such exceptions until you're using them. See the two-handed property for an example of such a property. #DnD Įven though the Extra Attack feature in D&D doesn’t impose any limitations on which weapons can be used with it, some weapons have properties that create limits. The no-fuss way to wield two different weapons of any type is Extra Attack. The two-weapon-fighting bonus action in the combat rules is a way to eke out one more attack if you follow its limitations. In D&D, you can dual wield any two weapons with the Extra Attack feature. Hi Jeremy, can you dual wield hand crossbows or not in 5e? All the rules seem to make this an invalid option, but people are still doing mental gymnastics to argue you can and I haven't seen anything from you guys ruling one way or the other □ ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |